The case is Cilento v. Cilento, and the appellate court upheld the matrimonial settlement agreement against the defendant/husband’s objection. In relevant part, the settlement agreement stipulated that the husband/father’s income was $90,000 per year, and that he would pay $4,000 per month in child support until the youngest child was emancipated. That works out to...
The appellate division in Azria v Azria ruled that there was no showing that the information sought was crucial to resolving a key issue in the litigation and therefore upheld the trial court’s denial of letters rogatory. Letters rogatory are a formal request from one jurisdiction’s court to another. In this case the wife sought...
Interesting ethics opinion in matrimonial case Dudhia v Agarwal. Basically the wife in that case retained Firm A and was working with Attorney X. Subsequently Attorney X left Firm A for Firm B and wife transferred her representation to Attorney X at Firm B. The husband subsequently retained Firm A. A disqualification motion was denied...
This is the take-away from Poppe v. Poppe. I was going to write about how the mother/appellant was seemingly some sort of tax lawyer as she represented her husband in tax proceedings… but after some light googling it seems that the appellant is actually a family and divorce lawyer. Which kind of makes my point...
This website is a form of attorney advertising. Previous results are no guarantee of future outcomes. Copyright 2023SERVICES
LINKS
FREE CONSULTATION
Law Office of Bryan Greenberg, LLC
